Rivers First

We have only one Assignment, Vote Tinubu out.

Breaking 🔥
Justice Liman of the FHC has ruled that Sen David Mark and others were duly elected as Excos of ADC.

Don't forget, a vote for Tinubu, is a vote for hunger, we are not voting Tinubu/APC come 2027, are you with me?

Igbo's: Rivers people are Igbo, those saying they are Benin are efulefus.

Rivers man: I want to contest for President, my South east brothers we are one, support me.

Igbo's: Rivers people are south south, they are not true Igbo's.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Before you vote for anyone contesting election under rainbow confusion, ask them the agreement they signed?

Do not vote for rainbow confusion if you want Rivers State to move forward.

If you vote Tinubu again for President, your suffering will continue, are you ready to vote out APC?

It is Atiku Abubakar, and Rotimi Amaechi's turn to be President and vice president respectively, get your PVC.

Breaking: Appeal Court suspends ex*****on of judgment against ADC, 4 others

ABUJA — The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ordered the stay of ex*****on of the judgment that directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and four other political parties.

In a unanimous decision, a three-member panel of the appellate court led by Justice A. B. Mohammed, berated Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja for flouting an order it made on May 22, which directed him to suspend proceedings before him.

The appellate court held that Justice Lifu’s action amounted to an affront on the hierarchy of courts.

It held that the lower court’s action was “the highest form of judicial impertinence,” stressing that the Supreme Court previously held that a judge who acted in such manner “is unfit for the bench as it amounts to judicial rascality.”

“Courts are enjoined to protect their integrity. This Court has supervisory authority over the trial court. The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is a brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution.

“This court has the duty to invoke its powers in ensuring that its orders are made.

“The application for stay of ex*****on is here yet granted. The enforcement of the judgment is stayed,” the appellate court held.