Election Transparency Initiative

Democrats have harkened America back-in-time to justify their planned federal takeover of elections.

But this is nothing more than a media-assisted voter suppression myth to try to convince you that election integrity is racist.

Civics tests like this were used to bar black citizens from voting. CA, CT, DE & others all had constitutional and/or statutory provisions to impede minority voting.

Suggesting access to voting is worse today than in 1958 is a patently ridiculous proposition.

What does real 'Jim Crow' look like? Start with this 1958 Georgia civics test⤵️

Is it any wonder Sen. Mark Warner is voting for the (S. 1)?

If it passes, his campaign will get a massive payday of $10.2 MILLION tax dollars

S. 1 would also allow Warner to pay himself a bonus/salary from those public campaign funds.

That's corrupt.

Sen. Feinstein is voting for the (S. !) to get $7.5 MILLION tax dollars for her own campaign. S. 1 would also allow Feinstein to pay herself a bonus/salary from those public campaign funds. Outrageous!

There are many very serious problems with HR1/S1, the , here's an oped on just 1: signature verification.

Signature verification is used across the country as a non-controversial security measure. HR1/S1 would ruin it - nationwide.

H.R. 1 Would Eliminate Key Signature Verification Safeguard | RealClearPolitics Democrats have already passed H.R. 1, also known as the For the People Act, in the House of Representatives; fortunately, the bill faces a much tougher road in...

Why is Senator Jeff Merkley voting for the (S. 1)? Surely a potential $31 MILLION payday for his campaign wouldn't have anything to do with it... would it???

S. 1 would create a massive payday for corrupt politicians: Not only giving their campaigns millions of taxpayer dollars, but also allowing campaigns to use funds for personal expenses & pay family members

Senator Deb Fischer is correct: The federal govt. should NOT subsidize congressional campaigns.

Thank you for introducing an amendment to the to ensure politicians can't take MILLIONS of our hard-earned tax dollars to pad their campaign bank accounts

New Hampshire’s top election official, DEMOCRATIC Secretary of State Bill Gardner recently testified AGAINST S. 1, the mis-named "for the people act" which is better named the

Read his testimony:https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/SJC%20Testimony_Gardner1.pdf

Well-said, Senator Shelley Moore Capito!! S. 1 is NOT "for the people." It's certainly not for our deployed veterans, or Americans with disabilities. Instead, it will line the pockets of corrupt politicians & change the rules to ensure they're reelected.

Senator Jon Ossoff is voting for the (S. 1) to get $420 MILLION tax dollars for his own campaign. S. 1 would also allow Ossoff to pay himself a bonus/salary from those public campaign funds. Outrageous!

"As the American people think of populations in need of assistance, I have yet to encounter a single constituent that considers politicians anywhere near the top of the list.”

- Senator Ted Cruz during markup for the (S. 1)